Sunday, August 24, 2025

Gypsy Rose Blanchard: Queen of the Matricides

By Amy Williamson – PWR Network, Café Bizarre

Alright PWR Crew, buckle in. Tonight we’re not just talking about “poor little Gypsy.” We’re talking about what the crime really was — matricide. That word matters.

Because in all the documentaries, Lifetime movies, podcasts, and now TikTok “fandoms,” you’ll hear about a trumped up diagnosis of Munchausen by proxy, Dee Dee’s control, and Gypsy’s “escape.” But what you won’t hear is the cold, hard truth: Gypsy Rose killed her mother. And now her PR machine is making sure you forget it.

Gypsy’s Narrative Machine

While digging into this case, I typed into Google: “Will matricide be on the rise thanks to Gypsy Rose Blanchard?”

What came back? The same cookie-cutter article cloned across different websites. Identical sections: background, Dee Dee’s life, supposed Munchausen by proxy, poor Gypsy at the end. Same spin, same sympathy, dressed up like it’s a “deep dive.” It’s not journalism — it’s PR. Gypsy’s team is pumping out her narrative so it dominates search results, and that infuriates me.

She’s not just rewriting her story, she’s hijacking the entire narrative of matricide itself.

What “Parricide, Patricide, and Matricide” Really Mean

Let’s get terms straight:

Parricide = killing one’s parent(s).
Patricide = killing one’s father.
Matricide = killing one’s mother.

Rare crimes, sure, but real. According to FBI data, parricide accounts for about 2% of homicides in the U.S. In 2017 alone, 169 mothers were killed by their children.

And here’s the kicker: it’s not usually the “mentally ill teen” stereotype you’re fed. Most parricides are committed by adult, middle-class white males with no prior criminal history. But recently? More teens are stepping into that category.

Is Teen Matricide Rising After Gypsy?

Research out of the U.K. shows a rise in mothers killed by sons after 2016. That’s just one year after Gypsy’s case. Coincidence? Maybe. But the timing is chilling.

And the media doesn’t help. The way Gypsy’s story gets spun online — tragic heroine, survivor, influencer-in-waiting — sends the wrong message. That you can kill your mom, get a Hulu show, snag a husband, and monetize it all.

This isn’t “inspiration.” It’s influence. And it’s dangerous.

Why Abuse & Dysfunction Matter — But Don’t Excuse

Yes, Dee Dee was abusive. Sleeping in the same bed with your daughter for years, shaving her head for sympathy, controlling her identity? But proof has come out that Dee Dee was controlling an out-of-control GRB with real medical and behavioral issues from those diagnoses.

So yes, Dee Dee was wrong. But abuse does not equal an automatic excuse for murder.

Studies show that most adolescent parent-killers don’t even have mental illness histories. The common thread is dysfunction: chaotic homes, unchecked power struggles, cycles of neglect, or escalating violence.

Sound familiar? Because Gypsy wasn’t just abused — she was running that pink playhouse herself by the end. And when Nicholas Godejohn came in as her “rescuer,” he became her weapon.

The Carly Greg Case: Teen Matricide in Real Time

If you think Gypsy’s influence isn’t reaching teens, think again. This year, 14-year-old Carly Madison Greg allegedly shot her mother, then texted a friend to come see the body.

That’s the reality we’re living in — teen girls crossing the line, some abused, some dangerously antisocial, and all of them navigating the chaos of broken homes. The difference is, none of them are getting Hulu deals.

Final Thoughts

Matricide is one of the rarest crimes in the world. And yet here we are, with Gypsy Rose Blanchard crowned in pop culture as “queen survivor,” while the real truth is buried under her PR spin.

She’s not just a girl who “escaped.” She committed matricide. And until we start saying that word out loud, we’re just letting her — and her team — control the story.

Wake up. The data is shifting. The cases are adding up. And the Gypsy Rose narrative is not harmless entertainment — it’s influencing lives.

📺 Watch the full breakdown here:
https://youtu.be/G5go0m5Lrms

Support the PWR Network
🐉 Join the Dragonflies for early-access and behind-the-scenes moments → https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNwzV8xP7iCj5Q8wW9nRz2A/join
🌱 Wild Deodorant (20% off first order — code: PARAWOMEN) → https://shopwildrefill.com/PARAWOMEN

SEO Tags: Gypsy Rose, Gypsy Rose Blanchard, Matricide, Dee Dee Blanchard, True Crime, PWR Network, Café Bizarre

Wednesday, August 20, 2025

Chris Watts: Dodge Prison Confessions

By Amy Williamson – PWR Network, Café Bizarre

Alright PWR Crew, buckle in. Today we’re diving into the 2019 Dodge Correctional interrogation — the four-hour session where Chris Watts finally coughed up more than “I don’t know.”

Watts was shipped off to Dodge Correctional Institution in Waupun, Wisconsin, after trouble in Colorado. This isn’t just any lockup — this is the same prison that once held Ed Gein (yep, that Ed Gein), Jeffrey Dahmer, and Steven Avery. Watts is now rotting among the Midwest’s most infamous monsters.

But before we hit play on his four-hour “confession,” let’s rewind.

Transfer & Trouble

In July 2019, Radar Online reported Watts had already been placed under “close watch” at Weld County Jail before his Dodge transfer. He wasn’t on suicide watch, but staff kept eyes on him constantly. Once in Wisconsin, he joined a lineup of killers like Chris Coleman (Joyce Meyer’s ex-bodyguard who murdered his family for a mistress).

The Wisconsin DOC didn’t confirm it officially — thanks to the interstate compact rules — but commissary lists outed him. And yes, the man who once bragged about grilled chicken and peeled eggs is now pounding cookies and donuts on the inside.

Mistress Letters from the Shadows?

One of the wilder revelations: fellow inmate David Carter claimed Watts told him Nicole Kessinger was writing him in prison — under a fake name. Carter says Watts told him she wanted to “clear some things up.”

Whether true or Watts’ desperate fantasy, it raises eyebrows. Kessinger vanished from public view after the murders, allegedly changing her name. Prison officials supposedly cracked down on Watts’ mail once they caught wind of it.

The Confession Tape

This interrogation wasn’t just Q&A — it was Chris unraveling.

He admitted he strangled Shanann in bed after a bitter argument about separation and the kids.
He claimed Shanann “didn’t fight back” — suggesting maybe she was praying.
Bella, their oldest, walked into the room during the aftermath. Chris admitted carrying his daughters, alive, into the truck with their mother’s body.
At the oil site, CeCe was smothered first, with her blanket. Bella was last. His words: the memory of Bella saying, “Daddy, no” still haunts him.

It’s chilling not just because of the crime, but because of his detached, almost passive retelling — like someone else was “holding his hands.”

What’s Next

This blog only scratched Part 2 of the Dodge interrogation. In the next installment, we’ll hit Part 3 — where NK takes center stage and agents start pressing Watts harder. Plus, I’ll dig into Tammy Lee’s official synopsis to compare what she wrote vs. what we see.

Until then, PWR Crew — remember: do your own research, question everything, and hold your crystals high under that pink moon.

💬 Drop your thoughts: Do you buy the “something else was controlling me” line, or was this pure manipulation?

Shoutout to my PWR Dragonflies — you keep this network flying.

🔗 Links & Sources

📺 Watch the full live breakdown here:
https://youtube.com/live/t8xlhOqMj68

🎥 More Watts content playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhTOyG4ARzV_9LoJOocUONGnZkPtXSAo0

📰 The Café Bizarre Blog Archive:
https://thecafebizarre.blogspot.com

🌿 Sponsor Love: Wild Deodorant (clean, refillable, eco-friendly)
Get 20% off your first order: shopwildrefill.com/PARAWOMEN with code PARAWOMEN
Thanks to WILD for sponsoring the PWR Network — and thanks to YOU if you try it, you’re supporting us.

Monday, August 18, 2025

Dee Dee Blanchard: The Mom Who Made Munchausen by Proxy Famous… But What You Don’t Know About Her Daughter Gypsy Rose

Dee Dee Blanchard: The Mom Who Made Munchausen by Proxy Famous — But What You Don’t Know About Gypsy Rose

By Amy Williamson – PWR Network, Café Bizarre

Alright PWR Crew, buckle in. Everybody thinks they know the Dee Dee and Gypsy Rose Blanchard story — the mom with Munchausen by proxy who forced her daughter into wheelchairs, shaved heads, and endless surgeries until Gypsy snapped and had her killed. That’s the version you’ve seen on Dr. Phil, in Mommy Dead and Dearest, and plastered across every true crime documentary out there.

But that’s not the story I told in my live — and it’s not the one I believe.

Because when you strip away the Lifetime movie filter and really look at the facts, the paperwork, the interviews, and the way Gypsy herself talks, you see something different. You see a mother-daughter team running a long con. Yes, Dee Dee was manipulative and sick — but Gypsy wasn’t some wide-eyed innocent prisoner. She lied too. She exaggerated too. And she benefitted, right alongside her mother, until it all fell apart.

The Con of Illness

In the live, I walked through how this wasn’t Munchausen by proxy. Dee Dee didn’t act alone — Gypsy played her part. She sat in front of doctors, she repeated the lies, she leaned into the sympathy. Did Dee Dee orchestrate some of it? Sure. But Gypsy knew more than she pretended. She wasn’t just dragged from surgery to surgery against her will — she also learned how to manipulate.

Remember, this went on for years. Wheelchairs. Feeding tubes. Surgeries. Medications. And not all of it was unnecessary. Some procedures? She really had them. Some conditions? There were signs they existed. That’s why this case isn’t clean-cut. Gypsy wasn’t 100% healthy. But the way she and Dee Dee packaged it, performed it, and paraded it — that was the grift.

Dee Dee: Master of the Hustle

I said it in the live — Dee Dee was slick. She played the system like a fiddle. Free trips. Charity donations. Celebrities. Doctors signing off without asking too many questions because who wants to be the one to deny a suffering child? Dee Dee understood the power of a sob story and she milked it.

But here’s the thing: she didn’t do it in a vacuum. A hustle this big doesn’t keep rolling unless the ADULT kid plays along. And Gypsy did.

Gypsy: The “Victim” Who Lied Too

This is the part the mainstream won’t touch. Gypsy wasn’t just the abused child who suddenly woke up to her mother’s lies. She knew. She lied to her mom, she lied to doctors, and she exaggerated her illnesses herself. She got to go on trips, meet celebrities, get gifts, and live in a free house. She wasn’t chained in a basement — she was part of the performance.

That doesn’t mean Dee Dee wasn’t abusive. She was. It doesn’t mean Gypsy had an easy way out. She didn’t. But it also doesn’t mean Gypsy was this angelic figure who finally stood up to a monster. She was in on it. That’s what makes this case so messy — and why I keep saying, this wasn’t just Munchausen by proxy. It was a partnership in fraud that turned deadly.

Murder as the Breaking Point

Eventually, the con unraveled. Gypsy, tired of the control, tired of being treated like a child when she KNEW she was a grown woman sneaking online, found her way out through manipulation again — this time manipulating her severely autistic boyfriend into killing Dee Dee.

And the internet rushed to crown her a hero. But in reality? She traded one hustle for another. First, she played sick. Then, she played victim. And both times, people bought it. And now she's coned a disabled man into MURDER!

Why It Still Matters

In my live, I said this isn’t just about Dee Dee or Gypsy. It’s about how easy it is to fall for a story when it’s packaged right. Doctors, charities, media — they all bought it. And even now, the narrative is still warped. The truth is grittier: two women locked in a toxic con, both manipulating, both lying, both damaged.

That’s the version worth talking about. Not because it’s prettier, but because it’s real.

Links & Resources

📺 Watch the full breakdown on PWR Network: YouTube Channel
🌐 Support the Network: Wild Sponsorship – use code PARAWOMEN for 20% off

Sunday, August 17, 2025

Lorraine Warren’s Haunted Legacy: Matt Rife Buys the Paranormal

By Amy Williamson – PWR Network, Café Bizarre

Intro & Disclaimer

Alright Power Crew, crank your creepy playlists and drag out your crystal balls — we’re diving headfirst into the Twilight Zone. The Warren Occult Museum — home to Annabelle and dozens of spine-tingling artifacts — just got a new owner.

And the kicker?

It’s not a paranormal investigator, historian, or museum curator.

It’s comedian Matt Rife.

Yep, the guy cracking jokes on Netflix. Now he’s the supposed guardian of haunted relics that Lorraine Warren once called “like loaded guns.” Buckle in. This one’s on the strange side.

The Basement of “Don’t Touch”

You know the story — Lorraine and Ed Warren collected items they believed housed demons, curses, and spirits. Annabelle the Raggedy Ann doll is Hollywood-famous now, but the museum was never meant for Hollywood.

Lorraine’s own words from our 2008 ParaWomen Radio show still give me chills: these objects weren’t displays. They were containment.

Now someone’s paid actual money to be in charge of them.

Matt Rife: Paranormal or Punchlines?

So what’s going on? Why Matt Rife?

On one hand, he’s got visibility, energy, and cash. On the other, he’s a comedian — someone whose job it is to make people laugh.

Which leads to the big question:

Is this a brilliant mainstream × horror crossover… or a horror show masquerading as a gag?

The Paranormal Community Responds

Word travels fast when ghosts are involved — and the responses have been just as fast:

👻 Believers: “This is sacrilege.”
😏 Skeptics: “Nice. Haunted stuff finally gets some publicity.”
📺 Pop-culture fans: “Is it a museum or the latest reality binge?”

No matter what camp you’re in, one thing’s clear: nobody is sitting this one out.

Can You Buy Haunted History?

Here’s the real existential crisis: the paranormal was never meant to be transactional.

Ed and Lorraine didn’t build a merch catalog. They built a wall.

If you can buy something “haunted,” does that make it safer… or more dangerous?

Lorraine’s Voice Echoes Louder Now

Back in 2008, Lorraine warned us: cursed objects never stop being cursed.

Now that the museum is in different hands, her words hit harder:

“They’re not just things. They’re reminders. And some of them are still very much alive.”

Final Thoughts

Maybe Matt Rife approaches this with reverence. Maybe he turns Annabelle into a TikTok prop.

If you believe Lorraine, you already know: haunted objects don’t care who owns them.

So here’s the real question: is this going to be a fascinating new chapter in the Warren legacy — or a disaster waiting in the basement?

What’s Your Take?

Is this the worst possible handoff… or the most intriguing cross-genre wildcard yet? Sound off below. Let’s unpack it together.

📺 Watch the full “Buying the Paranormal” live on Highly Strange Daze:
https://youtube.com/live/24WnmR2YSiw

Support the PWR Network

Join the Dragonflies for early-access and behind-the-scenes moments → Join here
🌱 Wild Deodorant (20% off first order — code: PARAWOMEN) → shopwildrefill.com/PARAWOMEN

SEO Tags:
Lorraine Warren, Matt Rife, Annabelle doll, Warren Occult Museum, haunted objects, paranormal news, Ed and Lorraine Warren, Highly Strange Daze, PWR Network, haunted history, buying haunted objects, paranormal legacy

Saturday, August 16, 2025

Donna Adelson Murder-for-Hire Trial! MORE Florida MAN on PWR Network!

It's FLORIDA woMAN Friday!!!!

Donna Adelson Murder-for-Hire Trial: It’s Finally Happening Hey PWR Crew and my PWR Dragonflies 🧚‍♀️💎 — you’ve been waiting for this one, and it’s about to go down. The Donna Adelson murder-for-hire trial is finally hitting Leon County, and we’re going to be breaking it all down here on the PWR Network starting Monday, August 19, 2025. The Backstory We go back to July 18, 2014 — Florida State law professor Dan Markel was shot in his own driveway in Tallahassee after dropping his kids at daycare. He didn’t survive. The case shook the legal community, and investigators said it wasn’t random. It was a hit, fueled by an ugly divorce and custody battle with his ex-wife, Wendi Adelson. Prosecutors say Donna Adelson — Wendi’s mother — didn’t just complain about the situation. She plotted to make it go away permanently. Now, after years of twists, sealed testimony, and convictions of everyone else in the alleged conspiracy, the 75-year-old matriarch is facing her own jury. Who’s Already in Prison This case has been a revolving door of convictions before Donna ever took the stand: Charlie Adelson (her son) — convicted last year of first-degree murder, conspiracy, and solicitation. He’s serving life plus 60 years. Katherine Magbanua (Charlie’s ex-girlfriend) — sentenced to life plus 30 years. Sigfredo Garcia (one of the hitmen) — life in prison. Luis Rivera (the other hitman, Latin Kings gang member) — cut a deal, serving 19 years in exchange for testimony. With all of them locked up, the State says Donna is the last Adelson standing. Trial Details Jury selection begins: Monday, August 19, 2025, 8:30 AM in Leon County Court. Jury pool: Nearly 300 potential jurors called. Roughly 100–110 will be questioned, whittled down to 12 jurors + 3 alternates. Expected timeline: Could stretch into the week of September 8. Prosecutors say their case will take 5–7 days; defense estimates 4–6. Where Donna is now: She’s already been moved to Leon County Jail to wait for trial. Pre-Trial Drama No plea deal: Both prosecutors and the defense confirmed — nothing’s on the table. This is going to trial. Wendi Adelson subpoena: Defense is pushing for her to testify, but she’s fighting it hard. Remember, she testified in earlier trials under limited immunity. Whether she takes the stand again could be a bombshell. The prison snitch factor: A jailhouse informant claims Donna was still talking about finding ways to make things “go away” while locked up. That may come up in testimony. Why It Matters This isn’t just another family drama turned deadly. It’s a 10-year saga of privilege, power, and desperation that’s been called one of Florida’s most tangled murder-for-hire cases. And starting Monday, Donna Adelson finally faces the same system her son, his girlfriend, and the hitmen already went through. What’s Next We’ll be covering the trial daily starting Monday, August 19 right here on the PWR Network. And in the spirit of Florida woMAN Fridays that we do on the channel, you already know we’re going to highlight the bigger picture too — the women tangled in these crimes, the court drama, and the fallout that still ripples through Florida today. So buckle up, PWR Crew — this one’s about to get messy! Be sure to join us Monday HERE: https://youtube.com/live/LHCYfHSDnyE?feature=share HAVE you heard of this case? Have you been following it? Let me know in the comments xoAmy

#PWRNetwork #FloridaWoman #FloridaMan #FloridaManFriday #TrueCrimeCommunity #TrueCrimeYouTube #UnsolvedMysteries #CourtTV #TrialWatch #JusticeForAll #TrueCrimeContent #CrimeNetwork #FloridaCrime #MurderTrial #TrueCrimeObsessed #TrueCrimeChannel #TrueCrimeAddict #TrueCrimeCase #DonnaAdelsonTrial #FloridaTrueCrime

Life Goes On? The Amy Bradley Case & the Cruise Ship Creeps

By Amy Williamson – PWR Network, Café Bizarre

Intro & Disclaimer

Alright Power Crew, grab your Deloreans—we’re heading straight back to 1998, onto a Royal Caribbean cruise ship where 23-year-old Amy Lynn Bradley vanished without a trace.

Now, let me get this out of the way: this is my opinion and my research. I don’t buy for one second that Amy “fell” or “jumped.” Nope. She was tricked, targeted, and taken. And three men stand out in her final hours:

“Yellow” Douglas, the ship’s band member
Wayne Bradig, the cabin neighbor
Kirk Deweiler, the cruise director

Were they harmless characters in the background—or part of something much darker?

Background on Amy Bradley’s Disappearance

Amy boarded the Rhapsody of the Seas with her parents, Ron and Iva, and brother Brad in March 1998. Within days, she was gone.

Her story is back in the spotlight thanks to Amy Bradley Is Missing on Netflix, but anyone following this case knows the inconsistencies and creepy encounters run much deeper than what the docuseries packaged up.

Before we dive in—quick sponsor note: I don’t slap mystery chemicals under my arms like it’s 1995. I use Wild Deodorant: aluminum-free, refillable, and immune-system-friendly (autoimmune warriors, you feel me). It actually works—which is more than I can say for half the “natural” stuff on the market. Grab yours at shopwildrefill.com/PARAWOMEN and use code PARAWOMEN for 20% off. Supporting Wild helps support us.

Okay. Let’s talk suspects.

Suspect #1: “Yellow” the Band Member

Alistister “Yellow” Douglas played bass for the ship’s band Blue Orchid. He admitted Amy complimented his set, talked music, and even danced with him. He claimed he last saw her around 1 AM.

But multiple witnesses saw him with Amy between 5:30–5:45 AM—and one passenger claimed he handed her a drink. Yellow was spotted leaving the upper deck alone after 6 AM.

He passed a polygraph, but his own daughter later said she found a suitcase full of photos of white women after his cruise days. Creepy much? Add in the fact he allegedly told Amy’s brother Brad “sorry about your sister” before the disappearance was announced—yeah, the vibes are off.

Suspect #2: The Cabin Neighbor

Next door to the Bradleys was Wayne Bradig. He had casual balcony conversations with Amy. After she vanished, her mother claimed Wayne cranked his music loud, talking to someone.

Years later, he got busted in South Africa for illegally smuggling leopard hides. So yes—he had ties to smugglers. Bradig also admitted he liked to cruise alone. His interviews give off twitchy, evasive energy.

Was he directly involved? No evidence proves it. But in cases like this, “weird vibes” matter. His proximity to Amy puts him firmly in the circle of suspicion.

Suspect #3: The Cruise Director

And then there’s Kirk Deweiler, the cruise director. The family reported Amy missing to staff early, yet the ship didn’t fully search or stop passengers from disembarking in Curaçao.

Kirk’s own words still echo: “That’s one family’s unfortunate incident, but we still had 2400 people who paid a lot of money. Life goes on.”

Excuse me? That’s your take on a young woman vanishing on your ship? No empathy, no urgency, no accountability. Many—including Amy’s brother Brad—believe Kirk knew more than he let on.

It’s not just callousness; it screams cover-up.

My Theory

I don’t think one man pulled this off. I think it was a network—a trafficking pipeline operating on cruise ships. Photos of passengers went missing. Witnesses later spotted women resembling Amy in Curaçao and Barbados, some whispering her name directly. One FBI-confirmed photo even matched Amy.

And here’s the darkest layer: traffickers are known to impregnate victims, then use their children as leverage. Some eyewitness accounts suggest Amy may have had kids in captivity. If true, that explains why she never ran when seen.

So no, I don’t believe Amy fell overboard. I believe she was taken, hidden, and moved off that ship through a system designed to look the other way.

Closing Thoughts

It’s been 27 years. Families of the missing live in limbo, caught between hope and grief. Amy’s case is proof of how quickly someone can disappear—and how cruise lines prioritize profit over passengers.

Could she still be alive? I believe so. And even if not, the truth is out there—and the cover-ups need to be exposed.

Life may “go on” for cruise directors. But for Amy’s family—and for anyone who has followed her story—it won’t until she’s found.

💬 What’s your take? Do you think Amy was taken in a trafficking ring, or do you lean toward another theory? Drop your thoughts in the comments below—let’s dig in together.

📺 Watch our live breakdown here: Amy Bradley – Who Was Stalking Her?

🌿 Support our sponsor: Get 20% off Wild Deodorant with code PARAWOMEN → shopwildrefill.com/PARAWOMEN

🐉 Join the Power Dragonflies: Early access videos, members-only lives, giveaways & more → Become a Dragonfly

Friday, July 25, 2025

Addiction, Obsession, and the Descent: Watts & Kessinger Reexamined

By Amy F. Williamson | The PWR Network | Café Bizarre

We’ve talked about the affair.
We’ve talked about the bodies.
But we haven’t really talked about the high — the one nobody’s supposed to name.

In this live, I pulled the camera lens back and asked the question that sits underneath the entire Chris Watts case:
Were Chris and Nichol addicted — to substances, to each other, or to destruction itself?

👉 Watch the full live here

Because the version we were handed — that Watts just “snapped” after falling for a younger woman — has never been enough.
And what played out wasn’t just an affair. It was a full-body spiral.

🧠 What We Covered:

🚩 The overnight personality shift in Chris Watts — from dad bod to gym rat, husband to manipulator, almost like he was being rewired
🔥 The way Nichol Kessinger dove in head-first — fast, possessive, demanding total secrecy
🧪 The question no one in court ever pushed: Were they on something? Not meth, not hard dope — but something that gave them that hazy, detached, invincible feeling
🧠 How trauma bonding, sex addiction (yep, we reworded that for YouTube), and dopamine highs might’ve created a perfect storm
📱 Kessinger’s behavior after the murders — the obsessive Google searches, the cold detachment, the digital breadcrumb trail she never thought would be exposed
😶‍🌫️ And how no one — not law enforcement, not media — seems willing to explore the idea that this was a shared addiction, not just a one-sided unraveling

This wasn’t just two people “hooking up.”
This was a dangerous, compulsive entanglement that exploded into a full-blown annihilation.

🧃 And Yes — We Talked About Substances.

Not because we’re accusing anyone.
But because the behavioral changes were too stark to ignore.

Rapid weight loss.
Wild emotional swings.
Risky decisions.
And that detached, disconnected fog that floated around them before the murders ever happened.

We called it what it is: suspicious. And maybe more common than the public wants to admit.

💬 Why This Matters:

Because this isn’t just about Chris.
It’s about how unchecked obsession, untreated trauma, and unsupervised spirals can become lethal — fast.

You want to understand what happened? You don’t start with murder.
You start with need. craving. compulsion.

That’s what we broke down.
That’s what this case still hides behind shallow headlines.

🎥 Watch it here
And ask yourself: What were they chasing — and what did it cost?

—

☕ The Café Bizarre doesn’t shy away from the messy middle — because that’s where the truth tends to hide.
— Amy